Trussell Tussle

One of the  finest, most pure example of good in Beeston is our local CAB. A charity ran by volunteers, it dispenses advice for those hit by loan-sharks, crap landlords, debt, homelessness and a vast swathe of other issues where the public feel no other recourse than seek help from the CAB. I have used the service before, many years back when I had several problems hit at once and I faced homelessness, hunger and despair. They spent ages looking into my case, checking the relevant laws, ringing round various places and eventually got a solution together that kept the wolf from the door, and enabled me to get some space and get myself together. I did, and I cannot thank them enough for that.

While I was there, they offered me some travel tokens to get to and from Nottingham to deal with the issue, and a form allowing me to go to the Salvation Army and pick up two days food. Fortunately, I needed neither as the problem resolved faster than I thought it would. I was amazed at the dogged determination these wonderful people put in to helping me. I never forgot that. It was the true definition of charity.

Charity is perhaps at the forefront of our mind this time of year. I am not religious at all, but still think of the Easter story as useful in a secular manner. Jesus’s feeding of the multitude. Jesus throwing the money lenders from the temple. Jesus committing the ultimate charitable act, that of dying so the rest of us would be forgiven our sins. When Eric Pickles recently said that we were a Christian country, I didn’t bristle as much as some of my more militantly atheist friends. There still is a basic moral code in there, that once you boil off all the supernatural guff, says ‘Look after each other’.

However, I doubt that was on Pickles mind at the time. The Tories idea of Christianity is massively  at odds with the basic premise. Problem is, they are still seen as the ‘churchy’ party, while modern, monetarist Conservatism shrieks in terror at the meek inheriting the earth. The money lenders Christ overturned the tables of are the same people the modern Tory party loves best.

To overcome this, they get creative. Thatcher was once asked how her politics squared with the loosely socialist message of Christ. ‘Choice’ she replied, explaining that before Pilate Christ had the choice to either be executed or spared. Thus, letting us choose our privatised gas supplier was in-keeping with the Christian ethos.

She followed this up with the notorious 1988 ‘Sermon on the Mound’. This speech was given in Edinburgh’s Assembly Hall, which sits on top of the hill known as ‘The Mound’, hence the punning name. She tried to reinterpret Christ’s message again, quoting St Paul  “If a man will not work he shall not eat” as a mission statement. Christianity, she claimed, was nothing to do with social reform, but spiritual awakening, in one swipe dismissing many centuries of Philanthropy, charity and sacrifice committed by progressive Christians. Sod the meek, it’s all about getting to Heaven, and if that means crushing your kin under foot to get on Jacob’s Ladder, than so be it.

The sermon backfired magnificently. Many in the audience, made up of Church of Scotland clergy, were horrified by this perverted interpretation, and the moderator was so incensed he presented her with a set of church reports on poverty, homelessness and social disintegration triggered by her government’s policies.

Now we have shiny Dave Cameron, who has refound the God he struggled to tune into a decade ago. Back then, his faith ‘comes and goes, like Magic FM in the Chilterns’ . This made him look very much the modern man, fuzzy of faith. Yet with UKIP tearing away the traditional small c Conservatives, Dave has gone on record talking of his strong Christian values, claiming Jesus invented the Big Society.

It could be noted here that the only comparison Cameron’s clique has with Jesus’s is the predominance of males, one who will soon betray him (Gove? Gideon?)

An interesting thing to note here was Dave’s sudden hardening of Christian values came just as The Trussell Trust: a charity with loose but not explicit Christian values, revealed that food bank usage had surged massively due to the failure of welfare reform. Many leaders of faith groups, including 27 Anglican Bishops, also slammed the way the poor and needy had been scapegoated, targeted and attacked by the likes of Iain Duncan Smith.

Duncan-Smith was not happy with this and went on the offensive. Food banks ‘scaremonger’ he claimed, and ‘create need’. Both statements were said, I best add, without irony.

He refused to meet charity leaders, and floundered wildly attempting to paint them as ‘driven by a political agenda’. This is a line of argument our own MP uses to deflect criticism: any concern for her votes on policy, from NHS privatisation to the shameful selling of Royal Mail, is ‘politically motivated’ and thus filed in her wastepaper basket. Here no evil, see no evil…

Then, today, things reached a head. The scummy Mail on Sunday ran a ‘shocking expose’ on foodbanks, trying to prove IDS correct. Thus they marched into a foodbank in Nottingham, demanded three days food and left with a Waitrose Hamper. ‘NO QUESTIONS ASKED!’ thundered the headline.

Except that didn’t happen. The ‘journalist’, Mr Ross Slater, visited a CAB undercover and after extensive questioning by the volunteer there, was referred to a Trussell Trust foodbank, where he received three days basic food and signposted to other agencies that could aid his claimed problems.

This, to me, is a great act of charity and one that has become a necessity while the Coalition mess up the benefits system. The CAB and the Trussell Trust acted out of pure kindness, while the sniveling scumbucket that is Ross Slater and his editors wasted the time of a CAB volunteer; lied about their circumstances and then effectively stole from a charity.

Their may have been a criminal act here, and I’ve seen various tweets fly off towards Paddy Tipping to investigate.

It’s vile journalism, and has rightly offended and appalled many. IDS must be rubbing his hands in glee. But, rather wonderfully, there has been another effect.

When the Mail does such acts of shiteness, one often feels hopeless and in an impotent rage. You might write an angry Tweet, swear a bit on Facebook or, heaven forbid, blog about it. Yet there is something else.

Make a donation to the Trussell Trust, or the CAB. Show them that despite the attempted undermining of  the work they do, you support them. It’s easy to do. The Trussell Trust have a campaign on right now to donate the cost of an Easter Egg to their cause. Simply pick up your phone and Text EGGS88 plus the amount £1, £2, £3, £4, £5, or £10 to 70070
e.g. EGGS88 £5 to 70070. Easy as that. 

Or donate to the CAB here.

Their are two main books in the Bible, The Old Testament and The New Testament. As a former Christian, apologies for this oversimplification but: The Old preaches superstition, hate, vengeance, murder, intolerance and fear. This is the side of the hateful Mail and the grasping Thatcherite Tories.

The New preaches compassion, kinship, humility, charity love and hope. This is the side of charities, the CAB, those who see good in the world and wish to follow that path.

This Easter, whether you be a committed Christian; a follower of a different faith; a fuzzy agnostic or an atheist, show what side you’re on and bung the charities a few quid. And never, ever buy anything from the rancid Mail group newspapers.

8 thoughts on “Trussell Tussle

  1. Tamar says:


    Article: “After filling out a form giving his name, address, date of birth, phone number and the reason for the visit, the reporter was told to wait for an assessor to interview him.
    The woman, called Katherine, who was in her 60s, asked our reporter a series of questions about why the food bank vouchers were needed”

    I’d say that alone was breaking the Editors Code – but it alos could be argued it breaks the following PCC code of conduct :



    i) The Press must take care not to publish inaccurate, misleading or distorted information, including pictures.

    ii) A significant inaccuracy, misleading statement or distortion once recognised must be corrected, promptly and with due prominence, and – where appropriate – an apology published. In cases involving the Commission, prominence should be agreed with the PCC in advance.


    *Clandestine devices and subterfuge

    i) The press must not seek to obtain or publish material acquired by using hidden cameras or clandestine listening devices; or by intercepting private or mobile telephone calls, messages or emails; or by the unauthorised removal of documents or photographs; or by accessing digitally-held private information without consent.

    ii) Engaging in misrepresentation or subterfuge, including by agents or intermediaries, can generally be justified only in the public interest and then only when the material cannot be obtained by other means.

    Bearing in mind “It is essential that an agreed code be honoured not only to the letter but in the full spirit. ” I feel an official complaint coming on….

    • Chris says:

      I think that you are correct, it is a pretty clear violation of the code. However, judging from recent experiences that have been reported here it is unlikely that anything would come out of a complaint. By all means go ahead but you will need to put a lot of time and effort in just to get them to print a sentence of correction that is buried somewhere in the paper.

      The only way anyone can get a fair and swift response through the PCC is to be rich or powerful. Everyone else is just ignored.

  2. Maren says:

    Bravo! Slogged through the vile DM screed, then read several responses. Yours was by far the best and most comprehensive. I’m pretty sure there are US readers who would love to donate too. Trussell might want to think of ways for more of us to participate. Media is worldwide. We are, literally, all in this together.

    Best luck and better fortune in the future. Thanks, too, for sharing your personal story so effectively. ;-D

  3. Matthew Galtress says:

    Well said Lord B. I didn’t waste my time on that article, but there is a lot of this going around at the moment. I heard about this on the radio, but didn’t realise it was in Nottingham

  4. Barry says:

    This started off as such a nice article, but you really spoiled it at the end, and with a moment’s reflection I suspect you’d want to change that.

    If you check what leaders of other faith groups are saying you’ll find it’s pretty much exactly the same as what you said in the main section of your article. The very first link Google provided me was .

    It’s not a statement of a religion of hate, superstition, hate, vengeance, murder, intolerance and fear.

    Another old testament (in different translation) based religion has groups doing this (it’s the fourth google link, unfortunately the first three were about Islamophobia 😦 ) :

    Is it likely their food is spreading hate, superstition, hate, vengeance, murder, intolerance or fear? I hope you’ll agree it’s probably not.

  5. Judith Dare says:

    When did you last read the Old Testament book by book, like Micah for example? Or do you prefer to pick out a verse out of context that can say whatever you want?

  6. Ash says:

    I’ve also complained to the PCC, as described below. It only takes a minute and, at the very least, the organisation in question has to devote time to your complaint, time which may make them think twice before breaking the code again. I went to a talk by one of the founders of Hacked Off a while back and he also had useful advice :

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s